<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cut, Cut, Cut your Content and Procedures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2morodocs.com/2009/07/cut-cut-cut-your-content-and-procedures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2morodocs.com/2009/07/cut-cut-cut-your-content-and-procedures/</link>
	<description>New-age technical communication trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jplaza</title>
		<link>http://www.2morodocs.com/2009/07/cut-cut-cut-your-content-and-procedures/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jplaza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2morodocs.com/?p=145#comment-590</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree with all of jgoldstein&#039;s comments.

Again, a UI that works well wouldn&#039;t need help topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with all of jgoldstein&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>Again, a UI that works well wouldn&#8217;t need help topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgoldstein</title>
		<link>http://www.2morodocs.com/2009/07/cut-cut-cut-your-content-and-procedures/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>jgoldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2morodocs.com/?p=145#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I question whether Cut or Cut More would work well for languages and cultures other than English. In fact, I&#039;m not sure that Cut or Cut More work at all.

I don&#039;t have any issues with minimalism, but I think your examples go too far. For example, in Cut More, step 2...there&#039;s no context. There&#039;s nothing that says what I&#039;m supposed to do about Permissions. Look at it until it does something?  Even in Cut, the procedure looks quite unclear. Access:Global means ...what? If you&#039;re not reading the help topic with the screen displayed, you have no idea that Access is a list and global is an option in that list.

If the UI is so intuitive that you don&#039;t need words to explain it, why not just remove the help topic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I question whether Cut or Cut More would work well for languages and cultures other than English. In fact, I&#8217;m not sure that Cut or Cut More work at all.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any issues with minimalism, but I think your examples go too far. For example, in Cut More, step 2&#8230;there&#8217;s no context. There&#8217;s nothing that says what I&#8217;m supposed to do about Permissions. Look at it until it does something?  Even in Cut, the procedure looks quite unclear. Access:Global means &#8230;what? If you&#8217;re not reading the help topic with the screen displayed, you have no idea that Access is a list and global is an option in that list.</p>
<p>If the UI is so intuitive that you don&#8217;t need words to explain it, why not just remove the help topic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
